Should FDI be allowed in retail sector? Why?
(This essay is written by SUBBALEKSHMY US of our PO 20
Batch)
Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) has both advantages and
disadvantages. Since the advantages are more than the disadvantages, I think we
should go for FDI in retail sector.
FDI is a cross border investment, that is, foreign assets
are invested in organizations of domestic market, excluding investment in
stock. In developing countries FDI has become a vital part in their economy.
The availability of cheap labour, uninterrupted supply of raw materials, less
production cost and quick and easy market penetration have made FDI feasible.
If FDI is allowed in India, it will result in the cheap production facilities,
application of new technology and long term cash liquidity. FDI ensures better
operations in production and distribution cycles. It enables transfer skills
and technology from overseas and develops the infrastructure of the domestic
country. FDI provides the capital necessary for setting up organized chain of
retail stores. The physical capital invested is not easily liquidated.
On the other hand, FDI can lead to a large scale job loss.
Small scale retail business has virtually be wiped out in developed countries
like the USA and in Europe. Global retailers will create monopoly in this
field. This can adversely affect the supply of essential items. For instance,
food supply will be controlled by foreign companies. The farmers barely subsist
while the middlemen take the cream. This will lead to an unequal relationship
in the market. Moreover, the retail
industry which consists of individual stores, commercial complexes, agencies,
companies and organizations constitutes a major chunk of Indian economy. FDI in retail sector may strike a fatal blow
on the unorganized retail business, which is a source of income for millions. So we have to think twice before allowing
FDI in retail sector.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete